Falling markets or falling investor demand: What came first?

Owner occupier loans excluding, and then including refinances both saw rises, which are at $14.9 billion and $6.3 billion respectively, but investor loans are down to $10.7 billion: the only category to record a decline, down by 27.5 per cent compared to their peak from April 2015.

“As a result the principal is now being repaid and outstanding credit is reducing whereas in the past there was no reduction of the principal,” Mr Kusher said.

Therefore, the CoreLogic research analyst claimed that investors are experiencing a credit crunch for investors, while owner-occupiers are avoiding a credit crunch of their own.

Another factor for the investor lending environment has been the previous activity in Sydney and Melbourne in comparison to how it is currently, coupled with the lack of significant growth elsewhere.

“What is unknown is whether it is market conditions that have led to the fall in in investor demand or is it the fall in investor demand that has led to the decline in values; in reality it is probably a combination of both,” Mr Kusher said.

Comparatively, owner-occupiers make up 66.5 per cent of all loans, according to Mr Kusher, and demand for owner-occupier loans is stable.

However, as investors make up the minority share of all mortgage lending, and with the continued expectation of the softening of the Sydney and Melbourne markets and the oversupply in these cities, Mr Kusher states the impact of a credit crunch for investors is less than if a crunch were to happen for owner-occupiers.

Looking to the future, Mr Kusher predicted housing finance commitments overall to slow down.

“Given this, the overall value of housing finance commitments is anticipated to fall and the expansion in housing credit will likely continue to slow.”