Thinking of investing in property via an SMSF? Read this first

However, there are a number of important limitations to this. For example, you cannot live in property you purchased via an SMSF, and any equity that builds up from either paying principal on the loan or the increase in value of the property cannot be accessed and used.

Still, for those considering climbing onto property ladder through this approach, Stake’s head of SMSF, Kris Kitto, has some words of warning.

“Although it’s one potential avenue, it’s definitely not the best from a cost-benefit perspective due to the high and unavoidable upfront costs,” Mr Kitto said.

That being said, Mr Kitto did note the potential of recent changes in SMSF property investment regulations.

From 1 July, SMSFs will be capped at six members, rather than the previous limit of four.

“It’s possible friends and family could pool funds, i.e. each member transfers an identical amount to a new SMSF, which is basically used as a special purpose investment trust to purchase an asset such as property,” he said.

“The advantage is that the six individuals can keep their existing industry or retail super accounts open to ensure they have diversified assets as well as insurances.”

However, Mr Kitto noted that “running an SMSF with six members can also be tricky, especially if disagreements arise or someone wants to pull out their balance. Professional advice should always be sought if young investors want to take this route.”

Instead, he recommended that younger investors take a look at the First Home Super Saver Scheme (FHSSS).

According to Mr Kitto, “The FHSSS is the most tax-effective way of saving up to $15,000 per year (each) towards that first step on the property ladder, for their principal residence.”

Looking forward, Mr Kitto said, “Australians have a love of property, so it’s always going to be a key asset for a portion of SMSFs. However, I don’t see property investment within SMSF becoming any more popular than it is now.”

Tags:

• Latest

Share